56 Stories in 56 Days – The Final Problem

This story is of such importance, that I feel overwhelmed by the enormity of the task, writes Charlotte Anne Walters.

Well, where to start?  I suppose it’s best to start with Moriarty himself as he appears for the first time in this story.  And with this I have a bit of a problem.  It just feels a bit hurried, like Conan Doyle had decided to finish off Sherlock Holmes and needed to quickly invent a villain suitable for such a task.

Why haven’t we heard of him before?  If Moriarty was truly working away in the background for all those years doing his villainy, why is this the first time Holmes mentions him?  And the other problem, which readers of my previous blogs will know, is that I find the description of Moriarty’s inclination towards criminality very simplistic. To say, as Holmes does, that he has, ‘Hereditary tendencies of the most diabolical kind’ and ‘A criminal strain ran in his blood’, is very naive.  Surely someone who has studied criminality in as much detail as Holmes would know that such things are not hereditary.    So what really did turn the brilliant maths professor to crime?  Well, I have tried to answer this very comprehensively in my novel and it is based around the idea that he is an autistic savant.

There is much evidence to support this in the original text, such as his, ‘Phenomenal mathematical ability’, the way that ‘He does little himself’ and stays withdrawn from society instead paying and facilitating others to do the criminal acts for him.  Even the curiously oscillating head could be seen as a sort of twitch, or compulsion.  I have tried to flesh-out and give much more detail to this fascinating man and create a back-story to fill in the blanks left by the Final Problem.

As to the rest of the story, it does all feel a little hurried to me but is still gripping, clever and actually rather emotional.  The devotion which Watson shows is touching, and I remember how well David Burke portrayed this in the Granada adaptation.  I must also mention how fantastic I thought the characterisation of Moriarty was in BBC’s Sherlock – making him into a playful, flirty, camp but deadly villain was a stroke of absolute genius in my opinion.  I do hope to send the creators a copy of my book and will post up a blog with their feedback if they are kind enough to submit any and happy for me to do so.

I admit that during the writing of Barefoot, I pictured Moriarty as being a curious mix of Eric Porter, who played the character so well in the Granada version, and Mr Burns from the Simpsons (though obviously not yellow) with his bird-like features and domed forehead. That particular combination seemed to work quite well for me.

My own novel includes The Final Problem in great detail and I have tried to stick to the movements of the original as much as possible, just adding in my own characters and weaving it into my own narrative.  Holmes is working with the French Government and the adventure starts in Narbonne, the very place which Holmes writes to Watson from in the original.  I hope this section of my book is a good example of where the astute Holmes fans will spot many original references such as getting the continental express from Victoria and disembarking at Canterbury, to the argument in the Strasbourg sale-a-manger when Holmes warns of the dangers ahead and expresses his desire to travel on alone.  But, but by adding a new take on the proceedings and a back-story which explains so much, I hope new readers will enjoy it too whilst Holmes fans will appreciate the detail included and the way this has been adapted into something new whilst retaining elements of the original.

I spent so many hours slaving over this and my Penguin Complete Sherlock Holmes has so many notes, underlining, highlighting and drawings on the pages of The Final Problem that they are now almost impossible to read.   But, re-read it I have, and I must admit that it remains very enjoyable (especially as we know it isn’t really the end) and absorbing.  Though how it must have felt to those reading it when it was first published and there was no hope at that point of a return, I can only imagine.

8.5 out of 10. Despite all the good points and obvious significance it still felt a bit rushed and underdeveloped.

Agree with me? Post your own review below by clicking on the Leave a Comment link at the bottom of the post. I look forward to hearing from you.

My novel Barefoot on Baker Street has now been published. Here are some of the ways you can purchase it.

You can order my book in America here.

You can purchase the American Kindle version here

You can order my book in the UK here.

You can purchase the UK Kindle version here.

About barefootonbakerstreet

Author from Shropshire
This entry was posted in 56 Sherlock Holmes stories in 56 days. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to 56 Stories in 56 Days – The Final Problem

  1. cim902 says:

    I don’t mind the description of Moriarty, which I’ve always found interesting, and because I know that it was common, even in late Victorian and Edwardian times, for men of science to believe that criminal tendencies were inherited–and, like other character traits–could be determine from one’s physiognomy (hope that’s the right word), that bit doesn’t grate on me, either. But yeah, I do think that, after a pretty decent build-up, the ending is rushed. Oddly enough, I read it again last night, looking for evocative phrasing I could use in a title contest. It was going along just great and then…. It was over. Since I’ve read so many pastiche versions of it (like yours!) with more detail, I was surprised at how quickly Doyle gets the last scene over with. Of course it’s in Watson’s POV, but still….dang, man, Holmes made you a ton of money–at least give him a longer send-off! Still, since we all know why he despatched him IRL…I guess it all makes sense. Great post–and I love your book, btw!

    • Thank you so much, delighted that you love my book. I’ve had such a fantastic response from people that it makes all those years of stress trying to write such an epic story worthwhile. I do, of course, have my critics and am still at that stage where i’m very sensitive about my work, but my skin is getting thicker! And yes, you are quite right, after all the money Doyle made from Holmes he could have given him a more complex send-off.

  2. Gaurav says:

    I agree with the comment above. In those days, science did believe that criminal tendencies were partly hereditary. In fact, the British government passed a law in the Victorian era branding entire tribes in India as criminal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Tribes_Act

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s