Finding Sherlock Holmes through the generations – but always with the same result

Isn’t it interesting how different generations are introduced to Sherlock Holmes in new ways?  What a great testament this is to the adaptability and timeless appeal of one of fiction’s most loved characters.

We have three generations of Holmes fans in our family – my husband who is 46, me at 34 and my younger step-son Charlie who is 14.  Husband Tim discovered Holmes in the traditional way, simply through reading the canon.  This was prompted by finding the original works of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in his prep-school library as a child.  This interest has been sustained throughout his life and he has re-read each of the stories many times.  His earliest memory of seeing Holmes on screen was watching Basil Rathbone bringing the great detective to life, assisted by the lovable but rather foolish Watson as portrayed by Nigel Bruce.

I first encountered Holmes in my early teens – watching Jeremy Brett command the screen in the faithful Granada adaptations.  He was ably assisted by a competent and reliable Watson in the form of Edward Hardwicke.  I came upon the series too late to see the David Burke episodes but discovered them later via VHS video tapes.  So captivating was Brett’s performance, his compelling ability to display the eccentricity and instability of Holmes, that I was absorbed by the character and keen to discover more.  Chancing upon The Hound of the Baskervilles at a second-hand book stall was my introduction to the original stories.  I eagerly read my way through them all and have remained a fan ever since.

Charlie saw the 1st Guy Ritchie Sherlock Holmes film and enjoyed it very much but it did not make him want to read Sir Arthur’s stories – despite heavy persuasion.  He read my novel, Barefoot on Baker Street, and this ignited interest and discussion about the source material.  Then he received a Kindle for his Birthday.  Finding out that he could download the canon for free heightened his curiosity but it was watching BBC Sherlock on DVD and Sky Plus that really sealed-the-deal.  He loved the rich storytelling and how the episodes demonstrated Holmes’ unique method so visually.  He is now enthusiastically working his way through the canon on his Kindle, and loving it.  He’s even read my new book – 56 Sherlock Holmes Stories in 56 Days – and we have lively discussions about the ratings I gave to each story compared with his own opinion of it.

So there you have it – books and Basil, Granada, Brett and second-hand paperbacks, then finally pastiche, Kindle and Benedict Cumberbatch.   Three generations, one family, different introductions but the outcome is still the same – life-long Sherlock Holmes fans.

And what do these experiences have in common?  It was discovering the original stories that really captured us, regardless of how we found them, and has stayed central to our admiration ever since.  Other things come and go – films, TV shows, and pastiche – but the 56 stories and four novels by ACD remain at the heart of our enjoyment.  Timeless.

These experiences encapsulate our changing reading and viewing habits too – from TV and video to DVD and Sky, from paperbacks to ebooks.  How will the next generation first encounter Holmes?  At least now that there has been a resurgence of interest, I feel more confident than ever that they will – somehow.

About barefootonbakerstreet

Author from Shropshire
This entry was posted in BBC Sherlock, Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Finding Sherlock Holmes through the generations – but always with the same result

  1. Jennifer says:

    My friend Larry always says any way someone is introduced to Holmes is a good way, even if it be through the dubious canonicity of the Guy Ritchie films or the modern day takes, and I guess your article shows him to be correct.

  2. ZurEnArrhBatgall says:

    Great write-up! Everybody’s story of how they discovered the Great Detective is different, and I love to see what drew each person in. It was, funnily enough, the Guy Ritchie films that finally captivated my heart and my imagination enough to make me turn to the original Canon. That was two and a half years ago and I haven’t looked back since. Holmes (and Watson) have gone on to become two of the most-beloved characters in my fictional “pantheon,” and I so love Downey, Rathbone, and (believe it or not) Ron Howard in the role. And it’s positively lovely to read my way through the original Canon — Conan Doyle has re-whetted my appetite not just for mysteries, but for reading in general.

    Rathbone is “my” Holmes — but I’ll always and forever be grateful to Robert Downey, Jr. for pulling me into the world of Sherlock Holmes. ^______^

  3. Ship's Cook says:

    My way in was through Peter Cushing as Holmes and Nigel stock (I think) as Watson in the BBC adaptations of the hound and Silver Blaze. they seem a bit stilted today, especially oddly enough, compared to Cushing’s performance in the Hammer version of the hound from 1959

  4. NeveR says:

    Yeah, mine was Basil Rathbone – even though he died twenty years before I was born. I love Brett too, but Basil always has that edge of glitter, romance and genius about him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s