56 stories in 56 days – The Boscombe Valley Mystery

I’m sitting on a train travelling back home from London to the Midlands, writes Charlotte Anne Walters.  My meeting ended early and I arrived back at Euston station in time to walk towards Baker Street, following the route which Red – the protagonist in my novel – would have taken during a key scene.

I had strange Goosebumps at the thought of actually being there, in situ, and imagining how she would have felt running through the streets to reach 221b one stormy early evening.

Anyway, back to the matter in hand.  The train journey did give me the perfect opportunity to read the Boscombe Valley Mystery and have a think about what further insights it gives into both Holmes and his partnership with Watson.  Partnership seems to be the appropriate word because in this story it is clear how much Holmes needs Watson.  He even sends a telegram to Watson’s house requesting his company for a few days in the West of England while he investigates this new case.

The telegram arrives as the Watsons are eating breakfast and Mrs Watson urges her husband to go adding – ‘you are always so interested in Mr Sherlock Holmes’ cases’.  Watson replies, ‘I should be ungrateful if I were not, seeing what I gained through one of them.’

This confirms that the first Mrs Watson was Mary Morstan from the Sigh of Four and I can’t believe how blatantly Guy Ritchie ignored this in his film – more to the point I can’t believe how little this seemed to have mattered to Holmes fans as I have seen very little criticism of this error.  In the first Sherlock Holmes movie, Watson is engaged to a woman who is clearly not Mary as he has to go and visit her parents (Mary’s parents were both dead) and she meets Holmes for the first time in a restaurant not through bringing him the mystery of the Sign of Four.  This really mattered to me and coming so early on in the film it did rather spoil my enjoyment (not that Ritchie will mind of course – “”Oh I would happily give back all the millions I made if Charlotte Anne Walters would just enjoy my film.”)

Further evidence of how much Holmes has come to rely on Watson comes later on in the story when he asks him to be a sounding board to help him think through his ideas – ‘Look here Watson, just sit down in this chair and let me preach to you for a little.  I don’t quite know what to do, and I should value your advice.  Light a cigar, and let me expound.”  What a lovely thing to say, acknowledging not only how much he needs Watson but also that he is at ease enough with him to admit not knowing what to do and to ask his advice.

The case against young James McCarthy looks so solid that as a reader it is almost impossible to see how Holmes will save the day and all the more satisfying when he does – especially the part where he refers to Lestrade as an ‘imbecile’!

The story does follow a familiar Doyle theme of someone coming to England with ill-gotten gains from the colonies and their past finally catching up with them.  I suppose this was just the topic of the age – imperial advances and people becoming more geographically mobile.  Am I the only one who sometimes gets the stories muddled up because of this commonality?

Score for the Boscombe Valley Mystery = 7/10

Agree with me? Post your own review below.

My novel Barefoot on Baker Street was published this week. Here are some of the ways you can purchase it.

You can order my book in America here.

You can purchase the American Kindle version here

You can order my book in the UK here.

You can purchase the UK Kindle version here.

About barefootonbakerstreet

Author from Shropshire
This entry was posted in 56 Sherlock Holmes stories in 56 days. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to 56 stories in 56 days – The Boscombe Valley Mystery

  1. My poor dear Mary! Perhaps she should really be “The Woman” of the Canon. The error in the Guy Ritchie film did grate a bit as you say, how could Holmes not know Mary when she was his (our) client on the second case that I put to print?

    Mary often loses out though – in the Granada series they decided to leave her out after the Sign of Four as they said this would have complicated matters.

    The Boscombe Valley Mystery is one of my favourites too and I agree with your 7/10.

    JHW

  2. It is puzzling that, in “The Five Orange Pips”, Dr. Watson mentions that his “wife was on a visit to her mother’s”. The story is set in September 1887, which is a year earlier than “The Sign of Four” is usually dated, but in it Holmes and Watson speak about the events of that case, implying both that those events happened earlier in 1887, and that the Doctor’s wife is Mary Morstan. So her mother, at least, seems not to have been dead after all. Probably there was some story that we have not been told.

    That said, Guy Ritchie certainly broke with the canon in the way he introduced Mary in the film; and yes, it is a little annoying, I agree.

    To me the most interesting thing about “The Boscombe Valley Mystery” is how Christian Holmes seems to be in it. This and “The Blue Carbuncle” (set in 1889 and 1890, respectively), mark the high point of his apparent Christianity. For some discussion of how his religious opinions changed over the years, see my blog: http://acaseofwitchcraft.wordpress.com/2011/08/21/the-religious-opinions-of-sherlock-holmes/

    • FIVE took place towards the end of September 1887 whereas SIGN was at the beginning of that month in 1887 and not a year earlier. My mistake was in saying that Mary was visiting her mother (in The Strand edition) which could not be the case as both her parents had passed away. It was, in fact, her aunt and this was amended in other editions.

      JHW

      • On the basis of this story, I had formed the opinion that “The Sign of Four” was set in 1887 — rather than 1888, which is what the novel itself seems to imply — but it is pleasant to have one’s judgment confirmed by no less an authority than the author himself!

  3. Gaurav says:

    The whole “ill-gotten gains and past catching up” theme actually gets annoyingly repetitive, to the point of being predictable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s